| Supplements |
Economy
& Business Metro
Life - Mon Science
& Technology Spectrum Consumer
Bytes Cyber
Space DH
Avenues Metro
Life - Thurs Sportscene DH
Education Living She Open
Sesame DH
Realty Metro
Life - Sat Sunday
Herald Sunday
Spotlight Foreign
Panorama Fine
Arts/Culture Articulations Entertainment |
| |
|
|
Advertisements |
|
|
www.Flower
Delivery India.com, http://www.bangaloreonlineflorists.com/, http://www.gifts-to-india.com/, http://www.mumbaionlineflorists.com/, http://www.delhionlineflorists.com/ |
|
|
Deccan International
School |
|
| Gifts, Flowers to India Bangalore, Mumbai, TN, Delhi, Kerala, Gujarat, Pune, WB, UP, AP, Goa, Punjab & South
India |
|
| Shaadi Matrimonials |
|
| Real Estate
Properties in Bangalore |
|
|
Reviews |
Book
Reviews Movie
Reviews Art
Reviews |
|
Horoscope |
Weekly
Horoscope Year's
Horoscope |
|
Previous
Editions |
Yesterday's
Edition Archives |
|
Others |
Between
the lines- Kuldip Nayar Weather About
Us Advertisement
Details Subscribe
to Deccan Herald
|
|
|
Send
your Suggestions / Queries about the Website to
the Webmaster | |
For enquiries on advertisements & responses
: Contact
Us | | |
|
Deccan Herald » State
» Full Story
Housing society asked to prove BDA
plan sanctionBANGALORE,
DHNS:
The Karnataka High Court on Friday directed the Karnataka
State Judicial Department Employees’ House Building Co-operative Society
to produce the original layout plan submitted to the Bangalore Development
Authority for obtaining its approval in the early nineties.
A
division bench comprising Justice Ram Mohan Reddy and Justice H Billappa
passed the order while hearing a petition filed by Judicial Layout
Residents’ and Site Owners’ Association.
The Association has
alleged in the petition that the office bearers of the society had sold
the land reserved for civic amenities and parks by converting them into
residential sites by violating the approved layout plan. Several employees
of the Karnataka judiciary, including the judges of the High Court, own
sites in this layout.
While pulling up the society for not
producing the plan as directed earlier, the bench has also asked the
society to submit details about the extent of land reserved for civic
amenity purposes, parks, etc as per its original plan submitted to the BDA
before 1995 and the modified plan allegedly approved by the Yelahanka city
municipal council after 1995.
The court gave these directions when
the counsel appearing for the society failed to clarify before the court
whether the society had got its layout plan approved by the BDA or not
before selling sites to its members in mid
nineties. |