Charges Against Judges Turned Members of Society

A] The Conspiracy of the said Judges Society with Government of Karnataka in so far else comming this JUDICIAL LAYOUT in existance commensed officially but illegally on Aug ' 30th 1985. To be pressized lands of 500 - 600 Acres abotting then existing Karnataka Housing board satellite town at Yelahanka was notified by government of Karnataka for fulfilling / providing sites / house / flat for the one's who do not own any of them and are incapable of purchasing the same in the open market. KHB is a State within the meaning of ART.13 of Consitution of India and also the acquisition for KHB is bonafide Public purpose. [027.06s][027.05][006.03 ] 

B] The judges society which is a Private Company got denotification / cancellation of 176 Acres of Land out of the lands to get notified in the favour of the Society. The Letter dtd 30.8.85 of these facts never speaks of "Government approval or Prior Approval;" in favour of society.

C] In ILR 1995 KAR 3139 the presiding Judges ro defend there brother Judges and other lot mis - interpretted this letter as " prior approval " in favour of Society which is nothing but a fraud by the presiding Judges , the respondant Socity - Judges - Government of Karnataka on free and fair Trial of the case.

D] Matter of fact the Government having been intiated acquisition of Land in f/o KHB for no bonofide or any better Public purpose to interfere with a acquisiton proceedings is a fraud on the Land Acquisiton Act.

E] This Arbitrary, presumably malafide action of the government could be attributed by the force of presence of the Law Secrty to Government of Karnataka Namely Mr.B.N. Mallikarjuna [Mem.No / SLF No. 1088] who became the member of the Judges Society on Dec 14th 1984. Later the said Mr. Mallikarjuna was appointed Judge of High Court of Karnataka. Later as chairman of Karnataka administrative Tribunal, Bangalore.

Land Acqusisition to form Judicial Layout was intiated under the state Law which was controvery to the Parlimentry Law.

The Society had entered into Aggreement with Govt of Karnataka in 1988 in accordance with PART VII of Land acquisition Act as per Section 41. Inviolation of this Aggrement the society and the Govt of Karnataka conspired to intiate the Land Acquisition's intention as for public purpose illegally as against "company purpose"

[005.01 ] [024.01 ] [026.04 ]

This Agreement has been kept suprresed fraudulently with Criminal intention till date in all the Court proceedings including the special leave petition No.[Civil.No.12153[2000] which is pending in Supreme Court. Worst of the fraud is that Mr.Justice R.P. Sethi [Membership.No. 2507 ]
and Mr.A.M. Farooq [Membership.No. ....Kept in Suspense to allow the Public to probe the facts of our claim- Informers will be prized with surprise ]who are members of the society suo-moto mentioned in judgement that not only this Society but also other housing Societies have entered into aggreement in accordance with PART VII of L.A.Act [Section 41] ; the fraud is this that they continue to be members and beneficiaries of this Society ! Justice Shivappa [Membership No. 2404] who was member / became member of Society and was earlier Adovate General of Karnataka dismissed writ petition No. 3955 and 6156 of 1989 for his personnel and his brother judges benefits dismissed the writ petitions which were bonafide.

[027.05][026.06][026.04][028.03][030.02][024.01][006.05][022.02 ]
[022.01 ][015.08 ] [016.01 ]

Should this Agreement were to be disclosed by either the society or the Government to the court; the acqusistion Proceedings would have been or rather should have been completetly quashed in the first of the cases and at the first instance arising against the society by the Land Owners whose lands were notified for the acquisiton or case by society against Government or land owners.

Afforesaid SLP of which begining was due to wirt petition No.2382 of 1990 which was got listed before Justice S.Rajaendra Babu, who was the member of the society; the society conspired with Justice Rajendra Babu and the respondants namely State Of Karnataka, Special Land acuisiton Officer Etc intentionely to take illegal stay of Conversion fine amounting to Rs.55 lakhs. Justice Rajendra babu at present happens to be the Judge of Supreme Court and he has built a house on the site alloted by the society to him in this Judicial layout formed in the lands which still remain agricultural in nature; violating various loss of land reforms, Urban development and there own Judgements. [026.06][026.08]

Infact the society had accepted to pay the conversion fine from agriculture to residential ; as is one of the clause of Terms of that Agreement.    [005.01 ]

An Undertaking was given by the society to the Govt of Karnataka promsing to pay the money/amount as demanded by the Government shall be paid by the society within the 90 days from the date of issue of notification under Section 4 of L.A.Act. Accordingly Government demanded Rs.2,02,55,734-50 in end of 1987, but the society deposited a money of total Rs.10,000 Only controvery to the undertaking in as much as the notification was issued in Feb' 1988.    [005.05]
[024.02A ]

The Society and the Govt of Karnataka tacitedly entered into a Criminal consipracy to delay / wave-off the claim of the demand money from Rs. 2,02,55,734-50 in end of 1987 to Rs.1,78,76,137-50 Crores in 1989. The Government instead of stalling the acquisition proceedings in 1988 went on with acquisition to please the member judges of the society by issuing notification under Section 6 of L.A.Act in Feb/march 1989; by which time the society had only deposited an amount of Rs.10,000 only.     [005.05 ]

Further the Government passed Awards to an extent of 159 Acers 26.25 Guntas on or before March 13 1991. The Society by that time had deposited only a total amount of Rs.43,76,685.40 which fact the society admits on its own in its wirt petition No.1600 of 1994.     [005.05][024.01]

Un-Veiling VEIL of Judges Vs Un-Veiling VEIL of Corporate Companies. The Supreme Court in similar case when private Company failed to abide by terms of payment as per agreement; How did Supreme Court Acted ? As in Judges case so in Skipper's case violation of terms of aggreement or securing Judgement by fraud by judges in High Court and Supreme Court does it not amount to contempt of Court, that too by judges themselves ? And should such contemers be allowed to enjoy fruits of contempt?       [020.02]

As per the Certified copy of " All Awards Extract;" provided to us by Government the amount of compensation payable is Rs. 2,02,02,489.40 as on 13.03.1991  [005.02]

WHERE DID MONEY COME FROM TO PAY THE BALANCE OF MORE THAN Rs.1.5Crores[Rs.150 Millions].We suspect the other agencies like Intelligence Bureau of Delhi under Ministry of Home Affairs of India who has a Branch Office for Karnataka located in Bangalore on Infantry Road No.25, which premises they have taken it on rent since decades thought it fit to get the Land and the building aquired.Accordingly MHA entered into Agreement with Government of Karnataka and have been depositing as per the demands in time. So deposited Rs. 2,25,63,002 [Rupees Two Crores Twenty Five Lakhs Sixty Three Thousand and Two Rupees ] on 13^th April 1993 and further deposited Rs.1,48,33,739 on 4.1.96 it seems as the totaL comensation as per the consent Award Passed. Further we suspect that the government in conspiracy with the Land owner did not taken over and handed over the Land and building to MHA and allowed Land owner to litigate your rights. the acqusistion proceedings in High Court on mala fide grounds and the high court considering the mala-fide as bonafidi ground quashed the acquisition proceedings presumbily to allow the state of karnataka to adjust the deficit of the compensation money payable towards to Judicial layout be made good from this or such funds of Central Government. 

 Evidence of MHA letter towards Deposit made.
[009.03]

If the above is not true of diversion / mis-use of Central Funds; then we are confident that the consent awards for an extent of about 77 Acres ; wherein the judges Society themselves appeared as the Land owners and handed over the Land to Government free of cost. One such copy of Consent award is addused as evidence represented by Secratry of the Society.

[004.03 ]

The High Court Of Karnataka Devision Bench quashed such fraudulent Consent awards were quashed in Amar Jothi House Building Co-operative Society Vs State Of Karnataka and Land owners etc and lands were returned to land owners.

[004.01][004.06][004.04][004.05][004.07 ]

Effects Of Fraud : What does Supreme Court opens?

[006.03]

In Judgement ILR 1995 KAR 3139 wherein except two Judges all other High Court judges< including Few Supreme Court Judges and Rtd Judges; and so also all other member Magistrates of the Society were respondents direct or indirect through Society.

[027.05][027.02][027.01][027.04]