1. This Judgment is Mother of all Fraud Judgments / Decrees. Epithet on Epitaph of Indian Judiciary : "Court of Records" made to be "Court of Frauds". Judicial Layout is result of these Judgments. We thank Judges who delivered this Judgment in 1995; dismissing True Facts but up-holding Frauds. Or else we would not have this chance to Investigate & Prosecute the Corrupt Judges.

         1995 Message: We all are Brother Judges. WE shall not allow anyone to split us or spit upon us.
          Note : In the Judgment below there are typographic errors ; We recommend readers to refer scan copy of this reported Judgment [027.05s] Our comments are given at some places {in colors other than Black} to Convey to the Authorities-That-Be that said Judgment is an result of Frauds , Conspiracies , suppression of true Facts , Corrupt motives, Criminal intention etc., as Means to End . High Court became Means & Ends are to some how save Judges from grave dangers & equally to see that sites allotted to them ( piece of land ) are also made secure.
            Presiding Judges to protect all other sitting Judges of High Court of Karnataka ( who were members of Fraud Society ) chose an Marriage of Convenience or you call it Unholy Alliance with Govt. of Karnataka. Advocate General had no any objections to file , though lot was there; but chose to hand-over the Brief to Judges themselves so that he can flow as per swing of Court's mood. He acted as an Agent for Unholy Marriage of Govt. & Judiciary. The Govt. & Judiciary thought it fit so to do, as it had done since 1985. Each other thought not to expose each other's crimes. Union of India which was a Party to proceedings was kept in Dark.

             S.L.P. of Petitioners' : Supreme Court dismissed out-rightly at the threshold! Courtesy CJI A.M. Ahmedi

                 Fate of Presiding Judges : K.S. BAKTHAVATSALAM & M. F. SALDANHA
Justice K.S. BAKTHAVATSALAM is retired. He should not be appointed as Judge or any other posts / employment ; but CBI should proceed with Prosecution of him under Prevention of Corruption Act [041.05]& I.P.C. [007]
             Justice M. F. SALDANHA who is still a sitting Judge in Karnataka High Court; CBI should proceed with prosecution of him in accordance with Section 2(c) read with Section 16 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 [041.05] and so also should be prosecuted for having rendered the following Judgment with Corrupt motives under relevant Sections of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

X.........Y.......Z.....