Corrupt Lok Ayukta N

Lok Ayukta
Corruption
Crusader?

Justice
N Santosh Hegde

"Lok Ayukta Institutional Corruption" " Rupees 17 Lakh Billion" " In Lok Ayukta Case File No: Compt/Uplok/BCD/64/99-2000/AR.2(164)" "When Past & Present Upa lok Ayuktas & Lok Ayuktas are Personally interested Persons in this 193 Acre SLUM Case + 867 Judges Lands Corruption case, It should have transferred Case to C.B.I for Corruption-Free Investigation" "Not handing over case to CBI & Itself Trying to Hushup case is Shaking very credibility of Lok Ayukta as an Institution" "Worst part, when Complaint is made In-this-regard to N. Venkatachala with copy of this CD, he files a Complaint against our Volunteers" "This is Mr. Clean Venkatachala & Lok Ayukta"

Bureaucrats Mission Successful
HIGH COURT LOK AYUKTA
http://www.JudgesPlot4Plot.com

e-Mail: contactus@judgesplot4plot.com

Corrupt

Upa Lok Ayukta

Patri Basavana Goud

Click-Here 4 JUDGMENT Deposition Statements of Witnesses:

1. D.Krishnappa Registrar of Lok Ayukta, Complainant 2. H.C. Nagabhushan 3. M. Krishnappa

4. Nagarathnayya 5. Muniyappa 6. T.V. Prabhakar, Investigation Officer, Vidhana Soudha Police Station 7. Deposition of Accused: Digvijay Mote

High-Ligts of Judgment of Acquittal: Para. 10: It is another fold of argument that the accused No.1 and 2 were distributing the hand bills and shouting slogans against the Hon'ble Lokayuktha will not amounts to any offence, because it is a Democratical Power given to all the citizens to express their DISSATISFACTION or SATISFACTION . Therefore, the allegation that the accused persons were crying and it was amounts to obstruction to the officers holds no water.

Para 11: PW-3 D. Krishnappa Registrar of the Hon'ble Lokayuktha office has deposed that both the accused persons were raising slogans against the Hon'ble Lokayuktha and tried to attract the publics in an indecent manner. He also deposed that by the act of the accused persons it was disrespect to the Hon'ble Lokayuktha and to the Judges. It is also the case of the prosecution that the accused persons have created false impression on the publics about the work of Hon'ble Lokayuktha. But I would like to say that it does not amounts to any offence, because the distribution of hand bills or holding a banner against any authority does not comes within the purview of sections as alleged in the charge sheet and which is sufficient to acquit the accused persons.

Para 12: Para12: All the witnesses have answered that they have seen the contents, but they are not in a position to give the description. Further the No-body is not aware what the CDs are containing. Even the investigator also did not say anything about the same. According to PW-1 and PW-2 the accused persons were shouting by holding banner and distributing the handbills. According to investigator, he has seized handbills , banner and CDs and filed the charge sheet. Whether the contents of CDs, handbills and banners will amounts to any statement or not is not investigated. It is not the evidence of investigator he has sent the CDs to know what it contained. Therefore, there is evidence that those articles have been seized and nothing further proceedings has been proved by the prosecution.

Para 13: In the complaint marked as Ex.P1 the time of the alleged incident is mentioned as 1.30 am., But it was ought to be 1.30pm., In this connection the IO who is examined as PW-6 has said that he has recorded the further statement of CWI and wherein CW-1 had said that the timing was not 1.30am., but it was 1.30pm., But when the same was questioned to complainant PW-3 he did not admit that IO has recorded his further statement. It means the further statement as said by the IO is false one is the argument of the defence counsel. But however it is not a fatal point to throw the complaint itself. Because the presence of accused persons and distribution of CDs and holding of banner near the office of Lokayukth is not deride by the accused person. It is his case that this false complaint is lodged just because he has given a petition to the Hon'ble Lokayuktha about the scandal. During the cross-examination of PW-3, an attempt has been made by the counsel to get admission over the same.

Click-Here 4: JUDGMENT PHOTOCOPY OF Judgment

000.04.00s	Past & Present Lok Ayukta[s] & Upa Lok Ayuktas are Plotters
000.04.02s	Bangalore Development Authority informed to Lok Ayukta in 1999, that Layout Not approved. It is a 1,000 Judges Slum