|
|
|
Fraud Defined:"No Judgement of a court, no Order of
a Minister, can be allowed to stand if it has been obtained by Fraud. Fraud
unravels Everything."
For complete judgement on Fraud, its effect and duties of Courts or Govt.
[006.03] & [006.05]
The alleged frauds which are committed by the Society [ A105
] are to the maximum extent are approved by the members of
this Society in its Annual General Body Meetings .
The beneficiaries of this society have formed an
Association called as JUDICIAL LAYOUT
RESIDENTS AND SITE OWNERS' ASSOCIATION admits in its Writ Petition
No. 40994 of 2002 and in its Annexures of the petition.
[040.01] index to WP. [040.02 is WP].
In other words the Members of this Housing Society [ 014 ]
The Lokayukta of Karnataka matter of fact had warned
to this society that a "search and seizure warrant shall be issued,
if the society fails to produce the approved (B.D.A.) layout plan of
so called judicial layout. The correspondence between the Lokayukta
and the Society; in kind of Annexures; which forms part and parcel
of a Writ Petition also confirms that the stories we have written
are authentic [023.27]
|
|
|
Where the Court is Misled by a Party or
the Court itself Commits a Mistake which prejudices a party, the court has the
Inherent Power to recall its order. [006.03]
|
Evidence of Frauds by Judges, for Judges and of Judges |
| |
Evidence of Frauds perpetrated upon law, Courts
and Authorities is adduced by Judges themselves in the High Court
which are live cases in the kind of
skeletons in Courts namely: in Supreme Court SLP No.12153 of
2000 [026.22][026.22A]. In High Court of Karnataka W.P. No.
15101 of 2001[023.27] and the other Public
Interest Litigation WP No.40994 of 2002[040.02 ].
|
|
|
|
It is
universally accepted that a trial Judge ought to be neutral and detached.
He must be kind and benign. He must have an omniscience and not subjective
confidence. He must be quite familiar with the law and knowledgeable about
human behaviour. He must have manifold "personality". It consists of,
among others, independence, courtesy, patience, dignity, open mindedness,
impartiality, thoroughness and decisiveness. Above all, he must have
social consciousness. There may be some variations in "this personality"
of the Judge from person to person, but whatever be the variations, the
central core of agreed standard is that he should be neutral and
impartial; calm and non-contentious umpire.[055.06]
The only GOOD Judgment & GOOD
Judge we have come across in 1000 odd Judges; who is
above Board to be corrupted; amongst all Judgments / Judges
(involved in Judicial Layout).
|
Highlights of Judgment (interim order):
| |
| |
- It is also evident from the
loan application submitted to the High Court by the defendant
that they have obtained loan for the construction for their
house. All these documents produced by them will come to their
help only when they are able to show that Sy. No. 98/2 or 98/7
belonging to the plaintiff have been acquired by the
society.
- Without acquiring the said Sy. No. the society
gets no right to execute the sale-deed in respect of sites
allotted to defendants 2 and 3 formed out of said Survey No.
98/7.
- Where as the defendants 2 and 3 have failed to produce any documents much less a
scrap of paper to show that they have got right, title
interest or possession over the Sy. No. 98/7 from the
Society had any kind of right over the
same.
- Even in respect of the sites allotted
to Defendants 2 and 3, no documents such as BDA plan or survey sketch have been produced to
locate and identify the same. [Flash Movie]
- Keep a copy of this order in O. S.
7973/99.
Fraud Judges having failed to get illegal order,
got this case transferred to another Judge Mr.A.T. Munolli; who
happens to be member beneficiary of Fraud Judges Society
& got a Fradulent Decree legalizing Land Grabbing by
Judges & so also Fraudulantly High Court Approved Loan got
legalized. [015.01]
[040.16]
[040.02]
For more: [016.01]
|
|
|
|
One, who comes to the court, must come with clean hands
We have no hesitation to say that a person, whose case is based on falsehood,
has no right to approach the court. He can be summarily thrown out at any stage
of the litigation. [006.03]
FRAUD JUDGMENTS
|
Fraudulent Writ Petitions & Suits:
| |
| |
The
Society filed various Writ Petitions & Suits Fraudulently. The
Society got the petitions/Suits fraudulently, got it listed and
heard by Judges who are Members / Beneficiaries of the Society. For
the list of the Fraud Judgments, etc.[501.00]
CONTEMPT OF COURT:
Contempt - Violation of the orders of the Court -
In addition to punishing the contemnors, the Court can pass
directions to remedy the breach of its orders - Well settled
principle, that a contemonor ought not to be permitted to
enjoy and/or keep the fruits of his contempt, applied -
Constitutions of India, Articles 129 and 142.
[020.02]
|
|
Staying of the Legal Govt. Dues:
| |
| |
Justice S. Rajendra Babu of Karnataka High Court (At present He is Supreme
Court Judge & Chief Justice in-waiting) who illegally allowed Writ
petition No: 2382 of 1990 & stayed the legal the Govt. Dues. [026.02] [026.06] [026.08] [026.22]
|
|
|
|
(It must act directly or by
reflected influence react upon the welfare of the State. It may constitute
an intentional violation of positive law, or it may be an official
derelict on of commission or omission, a serious breach of moral obligate
on, or other gross impropriety of personal conduct which, in its, natural
consequences, tends to bring an office into contempt and
disrepute.)[008.09]
Frauds & Conspiracies:
|
Frauds in Land Acquisition:
| |
| |
The Govt. of Karnataka and the Karnataka State Judicial Department
Employees House Building Co-op. Society Ltd., High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore entered
into tacit and illegal conspiracy of supresssing the Agreement executed between
them [005.01] as per Sec.41 of
L.A. Act; [003.05][003.09][003.08][003.01][003.04 ] according to which the
lands should have been acquired as for a Private Company under
Part VII of LA Act. on the contrary Govt. proceeded to acquire
the lands under Part II of the LA Act claiming to be for
"Public Purpose". And this Agreement was illegally,
intentionally, frauduluantly was supressed in the judicial
proceedings in High Court of Karnataka and Supreme Court of
India. The so called Judicial Layout formed on such
fraudualuantly acquired land is nothing but FRUITS OF
CONTEMPT.
|
("The
commission of an offence against the general law of such a quality as to
indicate that the incumbent is unfit to exercise the office")
[008.09]
|
Conspiracy of Govt. of Karnataka and Fraud Housing
Society: Crimes committed on Land Acquistion Act. [501.03]
| |
| |
Govt. claims
that 156 acres of land is acquired under Land Acquisition Act, 1894
(L.A. Act); but on the date of taking possession of lands in 1992
Govt. had not paid a penny to land owners or had deposited the
compensation in the courts as per law. [501.03]
|
|
Robbery & Misappropriation:
Rs 172 Crores Public Property[A106]
| |
| |
Our Claim that Rupees 172 Crores worth of
Public Property is Robbed, Misappropriated by Fraud Housing Society
stands confirmed by the very Evidence in kind of W.P. No. 40994 of 2002,
the Annexures , Prayers , etc., thereof. This petition which is treated
as Public Interest Litigation is filed by none less than the very members
of the Society under "Judicial Layout Residents and Site Owners' Association".
[A106]
|
|
Frauds/Conspiracy: "Fraud
Judges Society & BDA" [502.01]
| |
| |
The Fraud Housing
Society got a Fraudulent Resolution passed by B.D.A. in 1992 [021.19s] based on fraud claim that it owns
156 Acres [021.21s];
on which date the Society had not an inch of land in its
possession. Be it so. As per the prevalent Law every Developer
of a Private Layout was supposed to pay to BDA a sum of about
Rs. 6 Lakhs per Acre towards Betterment Charges like Cauvery
Water Cess, Ring Road Cess, Beggars Cess, Improvement charges
etc., .Till date not a single penny is paid.
|
"scarcely any political question arises in
the United States that is not resolved sooner or later into a judicial question"
is as true in India so it was then in the United States of America" [008.09]
|
Cheating to Banglore Development
Authority [502.02]
|
| |
This
Fraud Housing Society has become a Model for other Housing Societies
in Cheating to Banglore Development Authority; whereby BDA is
defrauded by at least 32 Housing Societies in Bangalore alone
holding an extent of 2500 Acres x Rs. 6 Lakhs / per Acre = Rs. 150
Crores [021.18]
|
|
Compensation: Judges' Society Cheating Govt., Karnataka
Govt. owes Rupees 268 Crores to Farmers [501.04]
| |
| |
Government Cheating to FARMERS Rupees 268 Crores in collusion with
Fraud Housing Society; on whose lands the so called Judicial Layout is formed.
[501.04]
The Fraud Housing Society on its
own honest submission; much before the Compensation Awards were passed;
admit in1990 that Lands acquired / being-acquired are not Agricultural
Lands but are Urban Lands.[026.09] . As the Fraud Judges
Society till date has not paid a PENNY and their S.L.P. is pending
in Supreme Court of India; we are of utmost belief that Supreme
Court of India shall take note of this fact and "Shall Do Complete Justice" in this case also
as in "Skipper Vs DDA" in accordance with Article 142 of
Constitution; and direct Fraud Judges Society and / or State
Govt. to pay to Land Owners @ Rs 400 to 500 per Sq. Foot of
land & interest thereon from 1990 to till date or alternately be
pleased to direct Govt. of Karnataka to put Land Owners in posession
of their respective Lands including any improvement / construction
thereon made. Such Direction from Supreme Court is Just &
Necessary; as so far Land Owners are denied
Justice & thereby made to Lose Confidence in Courts by
Judges/courts; to reinculcate & resurrect the Confidence
of Farmers in Supreme Court. The details of case pending before
SC is SLP No. 12153 of 2000.[026.22]
[026.22A]
The case is
clubbed with similar Fraud Housing Societies. Similar Orders may be
made to land owners of whose lands Fraudulantly are acquired by the
other 3-4 Societies.[026.01]
|
"The allegation against
the judge was that he had filed a false return of Income Tax."
[008.09]
|
Intelligence Bureau of India:
Land Acquistion compared.
|
| |
The Govt. of Karnataka and Judges thought it fit as to not to allow
IB's subsidiary called as SIB to locate their office and accomodation
complex near to High Court. Despite IB paying 3-4 crores of Rupees
in 1993 and Govt. of Karnataka having convinced and agreed to
acquire the property invoking Emergency clause under Land Acquistion
Act, for the reasons well known to Govt., failed to put SIB in
posession of property in 1993-94 as per law.
Whereas Govt. put
Fraud Judges Society which had violated all terms of agreement in
posession in Emergency manner which we think is kind of unholy
alliance of Govt. with Judges if not with Judiciary of Karnataka.
For More info on Land Acquisition of IB
[1E03]
|
Every Govt. or Public Servant: I.A.S,
I.P.S, M.P/M.L.A, who-so-ever-be Ministers including Judges required to act honestly and not to use his
position as a government servant for enriching himself or others. Every
dishonest act of a government servant, including acts by which he uses his
position for enriching himself or others would clearly amount of
misbehavior. [008.09]
|
|
|
Implicit in the oath was the
requirement that Federal judges and Justices must uphold and obey the constitution and
laws of the United States" [008.09]
Fraud Sale Deeds:
2600 Sale Deeds of Judicial Layout
|
Fraud & Conspiracy
|
| |
The claim of Fraud Judges Society stating that BDA has
approved the layout plan is just not a fraud
on Law , Facts , BDA & High Court but also a conspiracy in the kind of
Un-Holy-Alliance with Govt. of Karnataka in 1992; but to be admiited &
revealed by Fraud Judges in the year 2002.[A107]
|
|
Sites - be
Demolished
|
| |
500 to 600 sites to be Demolished out of 2600 sites already
Registered, High Court in some cases approved loans & most have built Houses
; by Fraud , Conspiracy, Cheating , Contempt of High Court etc., ; is hanging
like a Sword on Fraud Judges & morefully on High Court of Karnataka in a
case before it.[A107]
|
|
|
|
Fraud Judges Society
|
Illegal Actions of the Society
|
| |
This
Society's actions in forming the illegal Judicial Layout is or could be understood by reading between the lines of
the document which is a Notice issued no lesser than the vigilance commision
of Karnataka under Prevention of Corruption Act. [Flash Movie]
|
|
Society's Bye-laws [027.12]& Illegal Membership
|
| |
Many who are not employees of the Judicial Dept. are beneficiaries
contrary to Clause 10 B of Society's Bye-laws:
[10] RIGHTS
OF MEMBERS
All members shall be eligible to avail the benefits
as per the objectives under bye-law No. 4 subject to the condition,
that a member shall be eligible for allotment of site/flat/house
only if he fulfills the following requirements:
[b] he / she is
an employee of Judicial Department for which the
Society has been organised and has put in a minimum continuous or
intermittent service of 5 years in Karnataka
|
"It is also necessary to protect
the fair image of the institution of the judiciary from those
judges who choose to conduct themselves in a manner as to blur
that image. [008.09]
|
|
